The English diplomat Christopher Mont was at the German courts and was thus able to hear a thing or two about the appearance of Anne of Cleves (her brother had still not allowed the English lords to look at his sisters). Christopher never actually saw Anne herself but he reports that:
Everyman praiseth the beauty of the said Lady, as well for the face, as for the whole body. She excellelth as far the Duchess of Milan as the golden sun excelleth the silver moon.Another contemporary - and possibly more reliant source - was the French ambassador at the English court Charles de Marillac. Since it was not a French princess he had no reason to be inclined to lie about what he saw. After seeing Anne he said that she looked to be around 30 years old (she was actually just 24) as well as tall and thin. He wrote that she was:
Of middling beauty with a determined and resolute countenance.He went on to comment that she was not as beautiful as people had claimed her to be (mirroring the thoughts of Henry VIII) and continued with:
There is a steadiness of purpose in her face to counteract her want of beauty
Holbein's portrait of Anne - it shows a rather pretty and young woman |
After the divorce of the German princess and the English King descriptions of Anne of Cleves paints a picture of a woman who is not unpleasant to look at - it has to be stated that these accounts probably are more correct since it was no longer necessary to flatter the ex-Queen. When Henry decided to marry Catherine Parr it has been noted that Anne of Cleves was irritated by the fact that her former throne was being taken over by a woman "less attractive than herself". Since no one contradicted her it might have been true.
Recent discoveries have shown that Holbein actually changed Anne's nose in her portrait. X-rays of the portrait reveals that she originally was portrayed with a longer nose but even at that it was not larger than normal - it matches the length of Jane Seymour.
Finally there is the matter of her skin complexion. One of the things that apparently threw Henry most off was the fact that she was a lot "darker" in her complexion than what he had been informed. The long journey across the English channel had damaged her fine complexion - or that was at least what the courtiers could come up with.
So there is nothing that suggests that Anne of Cleves was terribly ugly. It is more likely that she was indeed a "middling beauty" that is not ugly but not extremely beautiful either.
What a conundrum. Her portrait looks better than those of Anne Boleyn who was reputedly good looking. If we had a time machine.
ReplyDeleteOne possibility is that she was too virginal, lacking spice
@aliantonet I agree that if her portrait is anything like the real Anne of Cleves then she was certainly pretty :) however, Anne Boleyn was not considered good-looking because she had a very "dark" look with brown hair and dark eyes whereas beauty was considered to be only those with blonde hair and "fair eyes".
ReplyDelete